The growth of revenues from tourism has slowed down

GD announces legal action against BBC in international courts over 'fa...

As the statement notes, GD will “use every possible legal means to ensure that the so-called media outlet spreading falsehoods answers for the dissemination of dirty, false accusations”.“This morning, the BBC published an article which, in addition to numerous absurd and false pieces of information, contains an accusation against the Georgian government that the Ministry of Internal Affairs allegedly used a ‘chemical substance’ against violent protesters during illegal rallies. Naturally, this so-called media outlet, which has been turned into a propaganda weapon of the ‘Deep State’, has presented not a single fact to substantiate this grave accusation.Moreover, all speculation is based on the opinions of specific individuals, among them Doctor Chakhunashvili, who is one of the active participants in illegal rallies, whilst his family member, his father, Giorgi Chakhunashvili, personally participated in the October 4 ‘overthrow of the government process’ and physically broke into the courtyard of the Georgian Presidential Palace. Furthermore, the article predominantly features interested parties, Gigauri, the accused Khasaia, the accused Shaishmelashvili, the convicted Bachiashvili and other similar individuals.The Georgian Dream communications team maintained active contact with the ‘investigative journalist’ before the publication of the article. We prepared comprehensive responses to every question posed by the BBC, addressing the British media outlet’s interests meticulously and in detail. Given that in recent times the aforementioned media outlet has become embroiled in more than one scandal, has repeatedly been confirmed to have spread falsehoods, and for this reason even the broadcaster’s top management was replaced, at the beginning of our response we set only two conditions—that our position be covered in full, we offered to provide evidence of every word we sent, whilst in parallel we demanded that, in observance of high journalistic standards, all reasoning presented in the article be based solely on evidence. In return, we were met with a jumble of lies and serious accusations against the government, which, as we have noted, are based on the narratives of interested parties and, of course, bear no relation to reality.It is well known to the public that several weeks ago, the BBC was embroiled in a scandal when the so-called media outlet broadcast a crudely edited interview with U.S. President Donald Trump, in which the context and content of the conversation had been distorted. As a result of this manipulation, the broadcaster’s director-general and executive news director resigned from their positions, though this more resembled rolling out the red carpet for the U.S. President than accepting responsibility for a mistake.That the BBC has no moral or professional obstacles to fulfilling dirty commissions and spreading falsehoods is also clearly evident from today’s published article, whilst the change in their management reminds us of the several changes of prime minister in Britain in recent years, which in that country has been followed not by fundamental change, not even by façade change, and as a result one ‘Deep State’-controlled government has replaced another.Because an outlet once considered authoritative, which today has been turned into a propaganda weapon of informal governance, has publicly spread false accusations against the Georgian government and has not presented even a single piece of evidence in the article to substantiate these accusations; because the so-called ‘journalistic investigation’ built on lies is primarily based on the narratives of criminals and has nothing in common with reality; because the BBC received exhaustive answers to all questions and did not publish even 1% of the substantiated responses in the article; because this dirty propaganda material is an attempt to smear the Georgian government, the Georgian police and, most importantly, Georgian statehood, we have decided to initiate legal proceedings against the fake media outlet in international courts.We will utilise every legal measure available to ensure that the so-called media outlet spreading falsehoods is held accountable for disseminating baseless, malicious accusations.Enclosed, we provide in full the questions supplied by the BBC before the publication of the article, along with the responses we submitted,” reads the Georgian Dream statement.

Georgian Dream Received GEL 4.1 MLN Donations in September

The information released by TI states that “in September, the party received donations from those whose companies received GEL 204 million in direct purchases from the state, GEL 16 million in agricultural subsidies, 1.4 million sq m of construction permits, and 17 mineral licenses.”“In addition to winning tenders worth GEL  2.5 billion since 2015, companies affiliated with donors have received a number of other benefits from the state - direct purchases, agricultural subsidies, construction permits and mineral licenses.For more information about donations, as well as information about the donors' business interests and their participation in state procurement, visit the website: www.politicaldonations.ge,” the organization says in a statement.

Georgia to abolish administration for Russia-occupied territory of Tsk...

According to Papuashvili, several legislative initiatives have been developed in consultation with the government, which will be tabled at today’s session of the Parliamentary Bureau. The Parliament plans to adopt these amendments by the end of the year.“I would remind the public that in November 2006, under the United National Movement government, unconstitutional elections were held in the Tskhinvali region, resulting in the proclamation of a so-called president of South Ossetia and the formation of a so-called alternative South Ossetian government. Through this action, the government of the day granted indirect legitimacy to separatist processes, an egregious and grave betrayal of Georgia’s state interests.Several months later, a Temporary Administrative-Territorial Unit Administration was established in June 2007, once again in breach of the Constitution, based on the very same unconstitutional ‘alternative government’. This decision artificially restored the administrative boundaries of the South Ossetian Autonomous Region, which had been abolished in 1990. This move later became one of the key factors enabling the 2008 Russian military aggression and the occupation of Georgia’s historic region of Samachablo.From today’s perspective, it is evident that these decisions were part of an external power’s geopolitical manoeuvre, with Georgia cast as a sacrificial pawn. The policies implemented under Saakashvili’s leadership provoked an escalation in the region and ultimately drove the country towards war.Against this backdrop, members of Georgia’s Parliament have assessed this decision as gross treachery against Georgia’s national interests, a view reflected in the constitutional lawsuit demanding that the United National Movement be declared unconstitutional. It must be emphasised that at a time when Georgia has spent years working to strengthen its policy of non-recognition, the United National Movement regime’s use of the term ‘South Ossetia’, even indirectly, was from the outset a betrayal of the Constitution and national interests. No ‘South Ossetia’ exists within Georgian legal or political space whatsoever.Accordingly, following consultations with the government, we have decided to abolish the administration of the administrative-territorial unit established on the territory of the former South Ossetian Autonomous Region.I should emphasise that the municipalities of Akhalgori, Kurta, Tighvi, and Eredvi will remain operational. These were elected in 2006 in full accordance with the Constitution. They represent the only legitimately elected and functioning government in the Tskhinvali region and thus constitute the sole lawful continuation of Georgia’s legal and constitutional framework,” declared Papuashvili.

Anti-Corruption Bureau to be disbanded; its functions transferred to S...

During a recent briefing in Parliament, Papuashvili explained that the functions of the Anti-Corruption Bureau will be entirely transferred to the State Audit Office of Georgia (SAO).“The second key aspect involves reviewing and consolidating institutional models that have existed for years, often in a fragmented or externally imposed form. We aim to strengthen the constitutional framework of the governance system and optimise the utilisation of state resources.Tackling corruption remains one of the government’s top priorities. Significant steps have been taken in this direction recently. The process involves the Department of Government Administration Efficiency, the State Audit Office, the Anti-Corruption Agency of the State Security Service, and the Prosecutor’s Office.Currently, the Anti-Corruption Bureau primarily handles the collection and monitoring of declarations from officials, political parties, and non-governmental organisations. Following consultations with the government, it was agreed that this function would be better suited to the State Audit Office, an independent, higher constitutional institution operating within the framework of public governance.In line with this initiative, it has been announced that the Anti-Corruption Bureau will be abolished from March 2, 2026, with its responsibilities fully transferred to the State Audit Office,” stated Shalva Papuashvili.

Negotiations with Russia on the return of IDPs to the occupied territo...

According to the Ministry, the Georgian delegation centred its discussions on the urgent need for Russia to fully fulfil its obligations under the ceasefire agreement, as well as on ensuring the safe and dignified return of internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees from the occupied territories to their homes.“In the period of November 11-12, 2025, the 65th round of the Geneva International Discussions took place, led by Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Lasha Darsalia.Throughout the negotiations, the Georgian delegation emphasised the core issues on the agenda, notably the necessity for Russia to implement its international commitments under the August 12, 2008, ceasefire agreement brokered by the European Union, and to facilitate the safe and dignified return of internally displaced persons and refugees to their homes from the occupied territories.The importance of restoring the Incident Prevention and Response Mechanism (IPRM) in Gali without preconditions was underscored, along with the need for the mechanism to operate regularly in Gali and Ergneti in accordance with fundamental principles.The Georgian side also strongly raised concerns about the occupation of the territories, highlighting the serious security, humanitarian, and human rights crises in the regions, as well as the destructive actions undertaken by the occupation regimes. The Georgian side has voiced particular concern over the recent unlawful opening of the airport in Sukhumi, which violates fundamental principles and norms of international law, as well as the commencement of regular flights and the initiation of rail and sea passenger services from Russia to Sukhumi.As usual, representatives of Russia and the occupation regimes departed from the negotiation table on one of the key issues on the agenda, the return of internally displaced persons and refugees. Consequently, as with previous rounds, the 65th negotiations ended without resolution.The Geneva International Discussions were established in response to the 2008 agreement brokered by the European Union. The core issues under discussion include the full implementation of the ceasefire agreement, the safe and dignified return of internally displaced persons and refugees, and addressing the security and humanitarian challenges created by Russian occupation,” the Georgian Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement.